# Decision Forums _Decision Forum Networks = Governance Networks_
See Nesting Constitutions pattern.
* Each group needs to understand (**VISUALIZE**) their relationship with other groups.
>It will be useful to consistently illustrate peer-neighbor relationships and distinguish these from hierarchical-nesting-recursive types of relationships.
* Each group will benefit from understanding (**VISUALIZE**) its way of making (agreeing) on decisions.
> Their particular places and rules for meeting and conversing that produce agreements.
* We will all benefit from understanding the relationships between decision making between groups (**VISUALIZE**).
>In particular, show the constraints and their compliance with relevant constraints (must not, must alway, may)
.
You can click on the above link and modify the diagram.
>The **red lines** represent overarching decisions and they are not socially acceptable choices to encompassed parties.
>The **green lines** represent open choices, "variety" that may be dealt with in different situations to adapt to particular environments.
The quality of laws is a VSM system 5 or Robin Asby's "A House of Representatives" function.
Quality of awareness for need to change laws is a VSM system 4 function or Robin's "The House of Expertise".
The quality of enforcing laws is a VSM system 3 function or Robin's "The Executive" function and "The Community Collective".
The aggregate of Must at any level is the sum of all the "musts" from above. Same for Must Never.
May must be massive compared to must and must not if we are to respond to unpredictable changes in environments at all levels.